Falling into Glăveanu’s Gap: A lyric essay searching for resilience through creativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24377/EJQRP.article3098Keywords:
lyric essay, heuristics, creativity, therapist resilienceAbstract
This paper is in two parts comprising a literature review and a creative, non-fiction, lyric essay format to explore interplay between ambivalent emotions, creativity, and resilience. The context is my own state affect between client sessions, as a psychotherapist and researcher. The lyric essay, “Falling into Glăveanu’s Gap,” that comprises the second part of this paper covers a period of great disquiet in my personal and professional life, when adverse life experiences impacted my research, and, as such, formed an integral part of the research itself. My self-search heuristic exploration forms part of a larger, doctoral enquiry into the interplay between ambivalence, creativity, and resilience amongst therapists, examining whether those engaged in creativity experience a greater sense of resilience. Resilience is the antithesis of burnout, a condition which disproportionately affects practicing therapists. This research argues that therapist education, training and continuing professional development provision, would benefit from a stronger focus on therapist emotion and affect, outside of the therapy room. Opportunities for engagement with creativity are recommended to aid the development of therapist resilience and to combat therapist burn-out.
Downloads
References
Adams, St. Pierre, E., & Kuecker, E. (2023). Reading: The long preparation for inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. DOI:10.1080/09518398.2023.2264244
Allan, H., & Arber. (Eds.). (2017). Emotions and reflexivity in health and social care field research. ProQuest Ebook. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-65503-1_2
Askew, M. (December 2021). The lyric essay: A contemporary mode of reading and writing. [Doctoral thesis, University of East Anglia].
Bossiere, Z., & Trabold, E. (Eds.) (2023). The lyric essay as resistance: Truth from the margins. Wayne State University Press.
Braniecka, A., Trzebinska, E., Dowgiert, A., & Wytykowska, A. (2014). Mixed emotions and coping: The benefits of secondary emotions. PloS One, 9(8): e103940. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0103940
BACP. (2019). British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy research ethics policy. https://www.bacp.co.uk/events-and-resources/research/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-research-in-the-counselling-professions/
Clark, A. (2017). Unconscious choice the dissociation of creative animus among writers and psychotherapists. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 62(5), 710-716.
Clough, P., & Halley, J. (Eds.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorising the social. Duke University Press.
Coates, D. (2023). In praise of ambivalence. Oxford University Press.
Church, S. (2012). On lyric essays and dancing in sequined pants. Fourth Genre: Explorations in Non-Fiction, 14(2), 173-179.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and anti-racist politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum.
D’Agata, J. (Ed.) (2014). We might as well call it the lyric essay. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Press.
Davies, D. (2016). Disquiet and the lyric essay. Fourth Genre: Explorations in Non-Fiction, 18(1), 169-182.
de Freitas, E., & Truman, E. (2021). New empiricisms in the Anthropocene: Thinking with speculative fiction about science and social inquiry, Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 522533.
Eakle, J., & Bailey, E. (2021). Playing Baroque lines through a museum landscape with Deleuze, Guattari, and Klee. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 567-579.
Fong, C. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 10161030.
Fusch, P., Fusch, G., & Ness, W. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19-32.
Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.
Glăveanu, V. (2010). Principles for a culture psychology of creativity. Culture and Psychology, 16(2), 147-163.
Glăveanu, V. (2020a). A sociocultural theory of creativity: Bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Review of General Psychology, 24, 335–354.
Glăveanu, V. (2020b). Wonder: The extraordinary power of an ordinary experience. Bloomsbury.
Glăveanu, V. (2021a). The Possible: A sociocultural theory. Oxford University Press.
Glăveanu, V. (2021b). Creativity: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Glăveanu, V. (2023). Possibility spaces: An invitation to foster transformative experiences of the possible. Possibility Studies and Society, 1(4), 436-450.
Greenberg, L. (2011). Emotion-focused therapy: Theories of psychotherapy series. APA.
Harrist, S. (2006). A phenomenological investigation of the experience of ambivalence. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 37(1), 85-114.
Haynes, E. (2022). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Using creative methods to research transactional analysis psychotherapy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 52(2), 134-147. DOI: 10.1080/03621537.2022.2019406
Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper Perennial. (originally published 1927).
Hein, S. (2021). Deleuze and absolute immanence: Achieving fully immanent inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 512-521.
Hershfield, H., Scheibe, S., Sims, T., & Carstensen, L. (2013). When feeling bad can be good. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(1), 54-61.
Husserl, E. (2001). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book (F. Kersten, Trans.). Kluwer Academic. (Originally published 1913).
Keenan-Lechel, S., Henriksen, D., The Deep-Play research group (2019). Creativity as perspective taking: An interview with Dr. Vlad Glăveanu. TechTrends, 63, 652-658.
Kotera, Y., Maxwell-Jones, R., Edwards, A., & Knutton, N. (2021). Burnout in professional psychotherapists: Relationships with self-compassion, work-life balance and telepressure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 5308. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18105308
Kuntz, A., Adams St. Pierre, E. (2021). Proclaiming the new: An introduction. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 475-479.
Larsen, J., Hemenover, S., Norris, C., & Cacioppo, J. (2003). Turning adversity to advantage: On virtues of the coactivation of positive and negative emotions. In L. G. Aspinwall, & U. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Perspectives on an emerging field (pp. 211-226). American Psychological Association.
Lomas, T. (2017). Ambivalent emotions: A cross-cultural review of their relevance to wellbeing. Qualitative Research in Psychology. DOI:10.1080/14780887.2017.1400143
Masten, A. (2015). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. Guildford Press.
Mazetti, M. (2019). In praise of ambivalence. Transactional Analysis Journal, 49(3), 181-194.
McLeod, J. (2010). Case study research in counselling and psychotherapy. Sage.
McLeod, J. (2015) Doing research in counselling and psychotherapy. Sage.
Mearns, D., & Cooper, M. (2005). Working at relational depth in counselling and psychotherapy. Sage.
Moss, S., & Couchman, G. (2012). The conflict between the interventions that prevent burnout and the culture of modern capitalism: The benefits of ambivalent emotions. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Organisational Psychology, 5, 13-24.
Moss, S., & Wilson, S. (2014). Ambivalent emotional states: The underlying source of all creativity? The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 24(2), 75-100.
Moss, S., & Wilson, S. (2015). The positive emotions that facilitate the fulfilment of needs may not be positive emotions at all: The role of ambivalence. EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing, 11(1), 40-50.
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Sage.
Noble, H., & Cole, B. (2020). Re-writing the pain: A lyric essay. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 10, 16-27. https://doi.org/10.24377/EJQRP.article2997
Penwarden, S., & Richardson, L. (2020). The power to speak: Poetic re-presentation as an ethical aesthetic research practice for narrative therapists. International Journal of Narrative Therapy & Community Work, 2, 58-67.
Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press. (Originally published 1966).
Rees, L., Rothman, N., Lehavy, R., & Sanchesz-Burks, J. (2013). The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgement accuracy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 360-367.
Roebuck, C., & Reid, K. (2019). How trainee therapists experience resilience: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 20, 545555.
Rogers, C. (2003). Client centred therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Robinson Publishing.
Sela-Smith, S. (2002). Heuristic research: A review and critique of Moustakas’ method. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42(3), 53-88.
Simionato, G., & Simpson, S. (2018). Personal risk factors associated with burnout among psychotherapists: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74, 1431-1456.
Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larking, M. (2022). Interpretive phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed). Sage.
Sultan, N. (2019). Heuristic inquiry: Researching human experience holistically. Sage.
Taruffi, L., & Koelsch, S. (2014). The paradox of music-evoked sadness: An online survey. PLoS One, 9(10), e110490.
University of Wales Trinity Saint David (2024). Research ethics and integrity code of practice. https://www.uwtsd.ac.uk/research/research-integrityandethics
Vandermeer, J. (2014). Annihilation. Fourth Estate.
Williford, L., & Martone, M. (Eds.). (2007). Touchstone anthology of contemporary nonfiction. Simon and Schuster.
Zhu, L., Bauman, C., & Young, M. (2023). Unlocking creative potential: Reappraising emotional events facilitates creativity for conventions thinkers. Organisational behaviour and human decision processes, 174, 104209.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Helen Noble, Beverly Cole

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of content in the European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the Journal. Journal articles are published as Open Access under a Creative Commons License which allows free download and use of the articles with appropriate attribution (to both the author and European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy) for educational and other non-commercial use.
