Conducting psychotherapeutic research with Free Association Narrative Interview
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24377/EJQRP.article3099Keywords:
relational research, reflexivity, working with unconscious processes, practitioner-researcher, psychoanalytically informed researchAbstract
Deciding on methodology and method can be a complex and anxiety provoking task for new researchers and doctoral students. This is a reflexive, first person account of a doctoral journey addressing some key junctions and critical decision-making processes during a doctoral project. The article captures personal and professional considerations throughout a qualitative study into female therapists’ experiences of working with male clients who were sexually attracted to them. The study employed Hollway and Jefferson’s (2008) hybrid method Free Association Narrative Interview (FANI) which involved multiple unstructured interviews with five female participants. FANI offers a framework within which researchers underlying motivations about the research can be explored. This paper aimed to show how FANI method offers a frame for bridging a practitioner-researcher divide (Archard, 2018) by providing an opportunity for practitioners to use their full range of skills and competencies from their clinical work and apply it for the purposes of research.
Downloads
References
Archard, P. (2020). Psychoanalytically informed research interviewing: notes on the free association narrative interview method. Nurse Res, 28(2), 42-49.
Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: mutuality in psychoanalysis. The Analytic Press.
Bager-Charleson, S. & Kasap, Z. (2017). Embodied situatedness and emotional entanglement in research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 17(3), 190–200. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12122/ful
Bager‐Charleson, S., & McBeath, A. (2021). Containment, compassion and clarity. Mixed methods inquiry into supervision during doctoral research for psychotherapists and counselling psychologists. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 22(3), 689‐707.
Ballinger, C. (2006). Demonstrating rigour and quality? In L. Finlay & C. Ballinger (Eds.), Qualitative research for allied health professionals (pp.235-246). Wiley
Bamberg, M. (2012). Narrative analysis. In: H. Cooper (ed.) APA handbook of research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological and Biological (pp77-94). American Psychological Association.
Bion, W. R. (1962). The psycho-analytic study of thinking. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 43, 306-310.
Bion, W. R. (1967). Second thoughts. Selected papers on psycho-analysis. Heinemann
Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5-46.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Jenkinson, E. & Davey, U. (2022, in press) Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In S.
Bager-Charleson & A.G. McBeath (Eds.) Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research (pp.19-38). Palgrave Macmillan.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 3(2), 77-191.
Bromberg, P. (1982). The Supervisory process and parallel process in psychoanalysis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 18, 92-10.
Capri, C. (2018). ‘We are actually, after all, just children’: caring societies and South African infantilisation of adults with intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 33(2), 285‐308.
Cartwright, D. (2004). The Psychoanalytic research interview: Preliminary suggestions. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52, 209-242.
Chamberlayne, P. (2005). Inter-subjectivity in biographical methods: mirroring and enactment in an organisational study. [Paper at the conference on ‘Biographieforschung im sozialwissenschaftlichen Diskurs’, Georg-August Universitaet Goettingen, 1-3 July, 2005]
Clandinin, J. & Connelly, M. (2000). Narrative inquiry, experience and story in qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Clarke, S. & Hoggett, P. (2009). Researching beneath the surface. Psycho-social research methods in practice. Karnac
Crociani-Windland, L. (2018). The researcher’s subjectivity as a research instrument: from intuition to surrender. In: A. Cummins & N. Williams (Eds.) Further researching beneath the surface (Volume 2), Psycho-social research methods in practice (pp 27-49). Routledge.
Cummins, A. & Williams, N. (Eds.) (2018) Further researching beneath the surface (Volume 2, Psycho-social research methods in practice. Routledge
Du Plock, S. (2016). ‘Where am I with my research? Harnessing reflexivity for practice – based qualitative research’, Special issue: The creative use of self in research. Explorations of reflexivity and research relationship in psychotherapy. The Psychotherapist, 62, Spring, 16-18
Etherington, K. (2007). Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qualitative Inquiry. 13(5), 599-616
Etherington, K. & Bridges, N. (2011). Narrative case study research: On endings and six session reviews. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 11(1), 11-22.
Finlay, L. (2021). Thematic analysis: the ‘Good’, the ‘Bad’ and the ‘Ugly’. European Journal Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 11, 103-116. https://doi.org/10.24377/EJQRP.article3062
Finlay, L. (2003). The Reflexive Journey: mapping multiple routes. In L. Finlay & B. Gough (Eds.), Reflexivity. Practical guide for researchers in Health and Social Sciences (pp. 1-21). Blackwell.
Freud, S. (1955). The Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud Vol. VII A Case of Hysteria, Three essays on sexuality and Other works (1901–1905). Hogarth Press
Freud, S. (1958). The Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud Vol XII The Case of Schreber, Papers on technique and Other works (1911–1913). Hogarth Press
Frosh, S. (2003). Psychosocial studies and psychology: Is critical approach emerging? Human Relations, 56(12), 1545-1567.
Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis outside the clinic, Interventions in Psychosocial Studies. Red Globe Press
Frosh, S. & Emerson, P. (2016). Interpretation and over-interpretation: disputing the meaning of texts. Qualitative Research, 5(3), 307-324.
Giovazolias, T. (2005). Counselling psychology and the integration of theory, research and practice: A personal account. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 161-168.
Goldfried, M. R. (2010). The future of psychotherapy integration: closing the gap between research and practice. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 20(4), 386–396.
Halling, S. (2005). When intimacy and companionship are at the core of the phenomenological research process. The Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 5(1), 1–11.
Hoggett, P., Beedell, P., Jimenez, L., Mayo, M. & Miller, C. (2010). Working psycho-socially and dialogically in research. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 15, 173-188.
Hollway, W. (2009). Applying ‘experience–near’ principle to research: Psychoanalytically informed methods. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(4), 461-474.
Hollway, W. (2016). Emotional experience plus reflection. Countertransference and reflexivity in research. The Psychotherapist, 62, 19-21.
Hollway, W. & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research Differently. Sage.
Hollway, W. & Jefferson, T. (2008). The free association narrative interview method. In: L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopaedia of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 296-315). Sage. Hollway, W. & Jefferson, T. (2013). Doing qualitative research differently (2nd edition). Sage
Hollway, W. & Froggett, L. (2012). Researching in-between subjective experience and reality. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13 (3), 140-157. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1203132
Hollway, W. & Volmerg, B. (2010). Interpretation group method in the Dubrovnik tradition. International Research Group for Psycho-Societal Analysis. http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/34374
Holmes, J. (2014). Countertransference in qualitative research: A critical appraisal. Qualitative Research. 14(2), 166-183.
Holmes, J. (2017). Reverie-informed research interviewing. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 98(3), 709-728.
Huysamen, M. (2018). Reflecting on the interview as an erotic encounter. Sexuallities, 0(0), 1-17.
Josselson, R. (2007). The ethical attitude in narrative research. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of Narrative Inquiry (pp. 537-566). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226552.n21
Lukac-Greenwood, J. (2019). Let’s talk about sex: female therapists’ experience of working with male clients who are sexually attracted to them. [Doctoral dissertation, Middlesex University / Metanoia Institute].
Lukac-Greenwood, J. & Van Rijn, B. (2021). Female therapists’ experiences of working with male clients who are sexually attracted to them – an exploratory study using a free association narrative interview method. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research Journal, 21(4), 957-969.
Long, S. (2018). Socioanalytic interview. In K. Stamenova, and R. D. Hinshelwood. (Eds.), Methods of research into unconscious, applying psychoanalytic ideas to social science (pp. 43-55). Routledge
McLeod, J. (1994). Doing Counselling Research. Sage Publications Ltd.
Mendelsohn, R. (2012). Parallel process and projective identification in psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Review, 99(3), 297-314.
Midgley, N. & Holmes, J. (2018). Psychoanalytic perspectives on research interview. In K. Stamenova &R. D. Hinshelwood (Eds.), Methods of research into unconscious, applying psychoanalytic ideas to social science (pp. 55-70). Routledge
Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Harvard University Press
Morrissey, J. & Tribe, R. (2001). Parallel process in supervision. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 14(2), 103-110.
Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counselling psychology. Journal of counselling psychology, 52(2), 250-258.
Murray, M. (2015). Narrative psychology. In J. Smith. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology, a practical guide to esearch methods (3rd Edition). Sage Publications Ltd
O’Connell Davidson, J. & Layder, D. (1994). Methods, sex and madness. Routledge
Orange, D. M., Atwood, G. E., & Stolorow, R. D. (1997). Working intersubjectively: contextualism in psychoanalytic practice. Analytic Press
Peacock, M., Dickson, J. & Bissell, P. (2022). Beyond the medical encounter: can the free association narrative interview method extend psychosocial understandings of non‐epileptic attack disorder? Journal of Psychosocial Studies, 15(1), 36‐51.
Plender, A. (2019) A psychosocial approach exploring the experiences of primary school Special Educational Needs Co‐ordinators (SENCOs). [Professional Doctorate. Tavistock & Portman NHS Foundation Trust and University of Essex]
Rooney, P. (2005). Researching from the inside – does it compromise validity? A discussion. A Technological University of Dublin Journal of Research and Innovation, Level 3, Issue 3.
Smith, J. (2007). Hermeneutics, human sciences and health: linking theory and practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2, 3-11.
Smith, J. & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.) Qualitative psychology, a practical guide to research methods (3rd Edition) (pp.51-80). Sage Publications Ltd
Stamenova, K. & Hinshelwood, R. D. (Eds.) (2018) Methods of research into unconscious, applying psychoanalytic ideas to social science. Routledge
Stenning, A. (2020). Feeling the squeeze: towards a psychosocial geography of austerity in low to‐middle income families. Geoforum, 110 (March), 200‐210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.035
Stromme, H., Gullestad, S. E., Stanicke, E. & B. Killingmo (2010). A widened scope on therapist development: designing a research interview informed by psychoanalysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7, 214-232
Thomas, J. (2018). “As easy to know…”: on the tensions between psychoanalysis and psychosocial research. In A. Cummins & N. Williams (Eds.) Further researching beneath the surface (Volume 2), psycho-social research methods in practice (pp. 3-27). Routledge.
Van Rijn, B. & Lukac-Greenwood, J. (Eds.) (2020). Working with sexual attraction in psychotherapy and supervision, a humanistic – relational approach. Routledge
Vicario, S., Peacock, M., Buykx, P., Meier, P. S., …Bissell, P. (2021). Women's informal surveillance of alcohol consumption in intimate heterosexual relationships during the early parenting period. Social Science & Medicine, 291, 114‐499.
Whitehouse – Hart, J. (2012). Surrendering to the dream: an account of the unconscious dynamics of a research Relationship. Journal of Research Practice, 8(2) 1-17.
Zayed, R. S. (2008). The changing nature of the phenomenological method: lessons learnt from dialogical psychotherapy research. Janus Head, 10(2), 551 – 577.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jasenka Lukac-Greenwood , Sofie Bager-Charleson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of content in the European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the Journal. Journal articles are published as Open Access under a Creative Commons License which allows free download and use of the articles with appropriate attribution (to both the author and European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy) for educational and other non-commercial use.
How to Cite
