Self-definition issues may veil relational needs and fears in negotiations of the alliance: A new way to conceptualize rupture and repair

Patrik Karlsson-Söderström; Rolf Holmqvist

doi:10.24377/EJQRP.article3112

Authors

Patrik Karlsson-Söderström Linköpings university Author
Rolf Holmqvist Linköpings Universitet Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24377/EJQRP.article3112

Keywords:

self-definition, relatedness, the therapeutic alliance, rupture, repair

Abstract

Needs for self-definition and relatedness in psychotherapeutic interaction have been described in theory and research but their role in rupture-repair episodes is still not well understood. The aim of this study was to explore the relational dynamics between therapists and clients during alliance ruptures and repairs through the lens of the concepts of self-definition and relatedness. Nine therapists were interviewed about their experiences in rupture and repair processes. Interview answers were analyzed with theory-informed interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) focusing on therapists’ and clients’ needs and expressions of self-definition and relatedness during these processes. Two themes were identified: Ruptures as imbalances of relatedness leading to strains in self-definition and Repair as a restoration of mutual self-definition to create balance in relatedness. The general finding was that ruptures developed as unaware imbalances between therapist and client regarding their needs of relatedness. This imbalance was, however, expressed and handled with behaviors that were oriented around needs of self-definition. After therapist-client negotiations over self-definition issues had come to an end, renewed and more mutual relatedness could be achieved. The findings underline the importance of self-definition and relatedness as fundamental aspects of rupture and repair processes. This study analyses how clients’ and therapists’ different relatedness expectations may be expressed as self-definition problems. After negotiation of ruptures, increased relatedness may ensue. The results can improve therapists’ understanding and handling of rupture and repair processes in therapy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angyal, A. (1951). A theoretical model for personality studies. Journal of Personality, 20, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1951.tb01517.x

Aron, L. (2018).Core competency four: The there and then and the here and now. In R. Barsness (Ed.), Core competencies of relational psychoanalysis: A guide to practice, study and research (pp. 119–141). Routledge.

Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in western man. Beacon Press.

Beebe, B., Rustin, J., Sorter, D., & Knoblauch, S. (2003). An expanded view of intersubjectivity in infancy and its application to psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(6), 805–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881309348769

Benjamin, J. (2018). Beyond doer and done to: Recognition theory, intersubjectivity and the third. Routledge.

Binder, P. E., Holgersen, H., & Hostmark Nielsen, G. (2008). Re-establishing contact: A qualitative exploration of how therapists work with alliance ruptures in adolescent therapy. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 8(4), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140802363167

Blatt, S. J. (2008). Polarities of experience: Relatedness and self-definition in personality development, psychopathology and the therapeutic process. American Psychological Association.

Blatt, S. J., & Luyten, P. (2010). Reactivating the psychodynamic approach to classify psychopathology. In T. Millon, R. F. Krueger, & E. Simonsen (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Scientific foundations of the DSM-V and ICD-11 (pp. 483–514). Guilford Press.

Barsness, R. E. (2018). Core competencies of relational psychoanalysis: A guide to practice, study, and research. Routledge.

Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085885

Bordin, E. S. (1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In A. O. Horvath, & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp.13–37). Wiley.

Chen, R., Atzil-Slonin, D., Bar-Kalifa, E., Hasson-Ohayon, I., & Refaeli, E. (2018). Therapists’ recognition of alliance ruptures as a moderator of change in alliance and symptoms. Psychotherapy Research, 28(4), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1227104

Cooper, S. H. (1998). Changing notions of defense within psychoanalytic theory. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 948–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00038

Eubanks, C. F., Muran, C. J., & Safran, J. D. (2015). Rupture resolution rating system (3RS): Manual. In C. J. Muran, & C. F. Eubanks (Eds.), Therapists working under pressure: Negotiating emotion, difference, and rupture (pp 149–190). American Psychological Association.

Eubanks, C. F., Muran, C. J., & Safran, J. D. (2018). Alliance rupture repair: A meta-analysis. American Psychological Association, 55(4), 508–519. https//doi.org/10.1037/pst0000185

Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wlodasch, D., Horvath, A. O., Solomonov, N., & Wampold, B. E. (2020). Assessing the alliance–outcome association adjusted for patient characteristics and treatment processes: A meta-analytic summary of direct comparisons. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67, 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000424

Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Allison, E., & Campbell, C. (2017). What we have changed our minds about: Part 2: Borderline personality disorder, epistemic trust, and the development of social communication. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 4(9), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-017-0061-8

Harris, A. E. (2011). The relational tradition: Landscape and canon. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59(4), 701–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065111416655

Haskayne, D., Larkin, M., & Hirschfield, R. (2014). What are the experiences of therapeutic rupture and repair for clients and therapists within long-term psychodynamic therapy? British Journal of Psychotherapy, 30(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12061

Hill, C. E., Nutt-Williams, E., Heaton, K. J., Thompson, B. J., & Rhodes, R. H. (1996). Therapist retrospective recall of impasses in long-term psychotherapy: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(2), 207–217.

Holmqvist, R. (2021). Principles and practices of relational psychotherapy. Routledge.

Horvath, A.O. (2018). Research on the alliance: Knowledge in search of a theory. Psychotherapy Research, 28, 499–516.

Hunter, J.,& Safran, J. D. (2020). Psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic therapies. American Psychological Association.

Kiesler, D. J., Schmidt, J. A., & Wagner, C. C. (1997). A circumplex inventory of impact messages: An operational bridge between emotional and interpersonal behavior. In R. Plutchik & H.R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 221–244). American Psychological Association.

Lachman, F. M., & Beebe, B. (1996). Three principles of salience in the organization of the patient-analyst interaction. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 13(1), 1–22.

Luyten, P. (2017). Personality, psychopathology, and health through the lens of interpersonal relatedness and self-definition. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 65(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065117712518

Luyten, P., Campbell, C., Moser, M., & Fonagy, P. (2024). The role of mentalizing in psychological interventions in adults: Systematic review and recommendations for future research. Clinical Psychology Review, 108, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102380

Mitchell, S. A. (1998). The analyst’s knowledge and authority. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 67(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332828.1998.12006029

Muntingl, P., & Horvath, A. O. (2014). The therapeutic relationship in action: How therapists and clients co-manage relational disaffiliation. Psychotherapy Research, 24(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.807525

Muran, C. J. (2019). Confessions of a New York rupture researcher: An insider’s guide and critique. Psychotherapy Research, 29(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1413261

Muran, C. J., & Barber, J. P. (2010). The therapeutic alliance: An evidence-based guide to practice. The Guilford Press.

Muran, C. J., & Eubanks, C. F. (2020). Therapist performance under pressure: Negotiating emotion, differences, and rupture. American Psychological Association.

Rhodes, R. H., Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Elliott, R. (1994). Client retrospective recall of resolved and unresolved misunderstanding events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.4.473

Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (1996). The resolution of ruptures in the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.3.447

Safran, J. D., & Muran, C. J. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. The Guilford Press.

Samstag, L. W., & Muran,J. C. (2019). Ruptures, repairs, and reflections: Contributions of Jeremy Safran. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process, and Outcome, 22, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.376

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research (2nd ed.).Sage.

Tufford, L., & Newman, P. (2010). Bracketing in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 80–96.

Wachtel, P. L. (2008). Relational theory and the practice of psychotherapy. The Guilford Press.

Wiggins, J. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. The Guilford Press.

Zilcha-Mano, S. (2017). Resolution of alliance ruptures: The special case of animal-assisted psychotherapy. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104516671385

Zilcha-Mano, S., Eubanks, C.F., Bloch-Elkouby, S., & Muran, C. J. (2019). Can we agree we just had a rupture?: Patient-therapist congruence on ruptures and its effects on outcome in Brief relational therapy versus Cognitive-behavioural therapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000400