Exploring service users, families, and professionals’ experiences with Open Dialogue in a Portuguese psychosocial rehabilitation unit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24377/EJQRP.article3113Keywords:
Open dialogue, collaborative approach, psychosocial rehabilitation, implementation, qualitative researchAbstract
Open Dialogue is a collaborative approach that emphasizes the involvement of the person at the center of concern (PCC), their family, and professionals in network meetings to foster mutual understanding and joint decision-making. This study explores the experiences of these three groups during the implementation of Open Dialogue in a Portuguese Psychosocial Rehabilitation Unit. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with thirteen interviews with four service users, four family members, and five professionals. The participants were selected by purposive non-probabilistic sampling. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis, using WebQDA software. Four dominant themes emerged: rethinking mental health care, implementation challenges, adherence to principles and impact on PCC, families, and professionals. Challenges included resistance to change, time constraints, and cultural adaptation. Key principles such as flexibility, immediate help, and acceptance of uncertainty were highly valued. Open Dialogue meetings enhanced communication, creating a more humanized therapeutic environment and fostering family involvement and professional collaboration. However, successful implementation requires ongoing training and organizational support.
Downloads
References
Acharya, T., & Agius, M. (2017). The importance of hope against other factors in the recovery of mental illness. Psychiatria Danubina, 29(3), 619-622.
Andrade, C. (2020). The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000
Bergström, T., Alakare, B., Aaltonen, J., Mäki, P., Köngäs-Saviaro, P., Taskila, J. J., & Seikkula, J. (2017). The long-term use of psychiatric services within the Open Dialogue treatment system after first-episode psychosis. Psychosis, 9(4), 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2017.1344295
Bergström, T., Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., Mäki, P., Köngäs-Saviaro, P., Taskila, J. J., Tolvanen, A., & Aaltonen, J. (2018). The family-oriented open dialogue approach in the treatment of first-episode psychosis: Nineteen-year outcomes. Psychiatry Research, 270, 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.039
Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 2333393617742282. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Jenkinson, E. (2022). Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In S. Bager-Charleson & A. McBeath (Eds.), Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy (pp. 23–46). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13942-0_2
Buus, N., Bikic, A., Jacobsen, E. K., Müller-Nielsen, K., Aagaard, J., & Rossen, C. B. (2017). Adapting and implementing open dialogue in the Scandinavian countries: A scoping review. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 38(5), 391-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2016.1269377
Buus, N., Ong, B., Einboden, R., Lennon, E., Mikes-Liu, K., Mayers, S., & McCloughen, A. (2021). Implementing open dialogue approaches: A scoping review. Family Process, 60(4), 1117-1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12695
Eassom, E., Giacco, D., Dirik, A., & Priebe, S. (2014). Implementing family involvement in the treatment of patients with psychosis: A systematic review of facilitating and hindering factors. British Medical Journal Open, 4(10), e006108. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006108
Einboden, R., Dawson, L., McCloughen, A., & Buus, N. (2024). Power, position and social relations: Is the espoused absence of hierarchy in Open Dialogue naïve? Health, 0(0), 13634593241249101. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593241249101
Florence, A. C., Jordan, G., Yasui, S., Cabrini, D. R., & Davidson, L. (2021). "It makes us realize that we have been heard": Experiences with Open Dialogue in Vermont. Psychiatric Quarterly, 92(4), 1771-1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09948-1
Freeman, A. M., Tribe, R. H., Stott, J. C. H., & Pilling, S. (2019). Open dialogue: A review of the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 70(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800236
Gidugu, V., Rogers, E. S., Gordon, C., Elwy, A. R., & Drainoni, M. L. (2021). Client, family, and clinician experiences of Open Dialogue-based services. Psychology Services, 18(2), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000404
Heumann, K., Kuhlmann, M., Böning, M., Tülsner, H., Pocobello, R., Ignatyev, Y., Aderhold, V., & von Peter, S. (2023). Implementation of Open Dialogue in Germany: Efforts, challenges, and obstacles [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1072719
HOPEnDialogue. (2023). https://www.hopendialogue.net/
Jacobsen, R., Sørgård, J., Karlsson, B., Seikkula, J., & Kim, H. (2018). “Open dialogue behind locked doors”: Exploring patients’, family members’, and professionals’ experiences with network meetings in a locked psychiatric hospital unit: A qualitative study. Scandinavian Psychologist, 5. https://doi.org/10.15714/scandpsychol.5.e5
Jacobsen, R. K., Karlsson, B., & Grov, E. K. (2023). Clinicians and supervisors' experiences with developing practices of open dialogue in network meetings in public mental health services. Journal of Family Therapy, 45(2), 197-210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12422
Jaiswal, A., Carmichael, K., Gupta, S., Siemens, T., Crowley, P., Carlsson, A., Unsworth, G., Landry, T., & Brown, N. (2020). Essential elements that contribute to the recovery of persons with severe mental illness: A systematic scoping study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 586230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.586230
Kinane, C., Osborne, J., Ishaq, Y., Colman, M., & MacInnes, D. (2022). Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: Implementing and evaluating a new approach to mental health care. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03731-7
Mosse, D., Pocobello, R., Saunders, R., Seikkula, J., & von Peter, S. (2022). Introduction: Open Dialogue around the world - implementation, outcomes, experiences and perspectives. Frontiers Psychology, 13, 1093351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1093351
Murphy, E. R. (2023). Hope and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 50, 101558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101558
Olson, M., Seikkula, J., & Ziedonis, D. (2014). The key elements of dialogic practice in open dialogue: Fidelity criteria. The University of Massachusetts Medical School, 8, 2017.
Renjith, V., Yesodharan, R., Noronha, J. A., Ladd, E., & George, A. (2021). Qualitative methods in health care research. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 20. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_321_19
Reupert, A., Price-Robertson, R., & Maybery, D. (2017). Parenting as a focus of recovery: A systematic review of current practice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 40(4), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000240
Schubert, S., Rhodes, P., & Buus, N. (2021). Transformation of psychiatrists implementing Open Dialogue. Journal of Family Therapy, 43(1), 143-164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12289
Seikkula, J., Aaltonen, J., Alakare, B., Haarakangas, K., Keränen, J., & Lehtinen, K. (2006). Five-year experience of first- episode nonaffective psychosis in open-dialogue approach: Treatment principles, follow-up outcomes, and two case studies. Psychotherapy Research, 16(2), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300500268490
Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., & Aaltonen, J. (2011). The comprehensive open-dialogue approach in Western Lapland: II. Long-term stability of acute psychosis outcomes in advanced community care. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches, 3(3), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2011.595819
Seikkula, J., & Olson, M. E. (2003). The open dialogue approach to acute psychosis: Its poetics and micropolitics. Family Process, 42(3), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00403.x
Skourteli, M. C., Issari, P., Dimou, L., Antonopoulou, A. O. A., Bairami, G., Stefanidou, A., Kouroglou, V., & Stylianidis, S. (2023). The introduction and implementation of open dialogue in a day center in Athens, Greece: Experiences and reflections of mental health professionals [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1074203
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Tribe, R. H., Freeman, A. M., Livingstone, S., Stott, J. C. H., & Pilling, S. (2019). Open dialogue in the UK: Qualitative study. British Journal of Psychiatry Open, 5(4), e49. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.38
Twamley, I., Dempsey, M., & Keane, N. (2021). An Open Dialogue-informed approach to mental health service delivery: Experiences of service users and support networks. Journal of Mental Health, 30(4), 494-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2020.1739238
von Peter, S., Bergstrøm, T., Nenoff-Herchenbach, I., Hopfenbeck, M. S., Pocobello, R., Aderhold, V., Alvarez- Monjaras, M., Seikkula, J., & Heumann, K. (2021). Dialogue as a response to the psychiatrization of society?: Potentials of the Open Dialogue approach. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 806437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.806437
Waters, E., Ong, B., Mikes-Liu, K., McCloughen, A., Rosen, A., Mayers, S., Sidis, A., Dawson, L., & Buus, N. (2021). Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(3), 811-816. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12866
Wusinich, C., Lindy, D. C., Russell, D., Pessin, N., & Friesen, P. (2020). Experiences of parachute NYC: An integration of Open Dialogue and intentional peer support. Community Mental Health Journal, 56(6), 1033-1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00556-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ana Raquel Ferreira, Raquel Simões de Almeida, Cecília Villares, João G. Pereira (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of content in the European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the Journal. Journal articles are published as Open Access under a Creative Commons License which allows free download and use of the articles with appropriate attribution (to both the author and European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy) for educational and other non-commercial use.
How to Cite
